Iranian singer Parastoo Ahmadi and eight members of her musical team have been sentenced to 74 lashes each and banned from leaving Iran or engaging in artistic activities for two years after a court found them guilty of violating the country’s public morality laws through an online concert. The verdict was delivered by a court in Iran’s conservative Qom province in a case linked to a performance that Ahmadi uploaded to YouTube in December 2024. Iranian authorities accused the artists of publishing “obscene content” and acting against public decency standards by staging and distributing the concert online. The ruling marks one of the most high-profile cases involving artistic expression and women’s rights in Iran since the nationwide protests that followed the death of Mahsa Amini in 2022, a movement that challenged the country’s strict dress code regulations and broader social restrictions. Concert sparked national and international attention The controversy began when the 29-year-old singer released a 27-minute concert video on YouTube in which she performed without wearing a hijab, a mandatory requirement for women in public spaces under Iranian law. In the video, Ahmadi appeared in a sleeveless dress while singing alongside four male musicians. She described the performance as a “fictional concert” in the caption accompanying the video. During the performance, Ahmadi sang Az Khoone Javanan-e Vatan (“From the Blood of the Youth of the Homeland”), one of Iran’s most recognized patriotic songs. The concert quickly attracted widespread attention online, drawing millions of views within days and generating intense debate both inside Iran and abroad. Supporters praised the performance as a bold expression of artistic freedom and women’s right to choose how they appear in public. Critics and conservative figures, however, argued that the concert openly challenged laws governing public behavior, dress codes and cultural activities. Authorities detained artists after video went viral Shortly after the video gained traction on social media platforms, Iranian authorities detained Ahmadi and several members of her musical group for questioning. Although they were later released, judicial proceedings against the artists continued. Prosecutors argued that publishing the concert online constituted a violation of Iranian laws related to public morality and cultural conduct. The court eventually ruled against Ahmadi and her colleagues, imposing corporal punishment and additional restrictions that effectively prevent them from pursuing artistic careers or traveling abroad for the next two years. The sentence has drawn criticism from human rights advocates, who argue that artistic performances should not be criminalized and that the punishment is disproportionate to the alleged offense. Women face strict restrictions in Iran’s cultural sphere Iran’s legal framework imposes significant restrictions on women’s public appearances and performances. Women are required to wear the hijab in public settings, and female solo singers face additional limitations under regulations enforced since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. While women can perform in certain settings, public solo singing by women and performances that authorities consider inconsistent with Islamic norms often face scrutiny from regulators and the judiciary. The issue has become increasingly contentious in recent years as many Iranian women have publicly challenged mandatory hijab laws. Social media platforms have become an important outlet for artists, activists and ordinary citizens seeking to express views that may face restrictions in traditional public spaces. Symbol of a broader debate For many Iranians, Ahmadi’s concert has come to symbolise a broader struggle over personal freedoms, artistic expression and women’s rights in the country. Supporters viewed the YouTube performance as a peaceful cultural act that reflected changing social attitudes among younger generations. Government officials, however, maintained that the concert violated laws designed to preserve public morality and social order. The case has reignited discussion about the role of artists in Iranian society and the limits placed on cultural expression. It has also drawn international attention at a time when Iran continues to face scrutiny over its treatment of women and enforcement of dress-code regulations. With the court’s ruling now issued, Parastoo Ahmadi’s case is expected to remain a focal point in the ongoing debate over freedom of expression, state authority and the future of social reforms in Iran. Women in Iran have faced punishment for defying hijab rules January 2024 – Roya Heshmati sentenced to 74 lashes:
Iranian activist Roya Heshmati was punished for repeatedly appearing in public without a hijab and for sharing photographs without a headscarf on social media. A court ordered 74 lashes and imposed a fine. The sentence was carried out in January 2024. April 2023 – Women arrested after yoghurt attack:
In April 2023, a man poured yoghurt over the heads of two women in protest at them not wearing hijabs. Iranian authorities subsequently arrested the two women for allegedly violating the country’s mandatory dress code, while the man was also detained.